Polysorbate 80 In Swine Flu Vaccines = Infertility

(Organic Health Advisor) – Would you feel comfortable being injected with a vaccine that contains a substance that has been strongly linked to infertility?  Well, if you take the Fluarix swine flu vaccine manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline or any of the other swine flu vaccines that contain Polysorbate 80 that is exactly what you will be doing.  If you are considering getting the swine flu vaccine, or any other vaccine for that matter, perhaps you should educate yourself about EXACTLY what is in these vaccines before you allow them to be injected into your body.

Perhaps you think that linking the swine flu vaccine with infertility is quite a stretch.  Well, let’s take this one step at a time.

#1) Polysorbate 80 is in the Fluarix swine flu vaccine manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline according to the CDC.  This is confirmed by the CDC in the document below…..

http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/B/excipient-table-2.pdf

#2) A medical study done in Slovakia injected newborn female rats with Tween 80 (Polysorbate 80).  These newborn female rats were injected with Polysorbate 80 at days 4 to 7 after birth.  The researchers found that Polysorbate 80 accelerated the maturation of the female rats, damaged the vagina and womb lining, caused significant hormonal changes, severe ovary deformities and ultimately rendered the young female rats infertile.

In fact, Dee Nicholson, the National Communications Director for Freedom in Canadian Health Care is not shy about saying that Polysorbate 80 is “linked to infertility in mice”.

#3) In the package insert for Fluarix, GlaxoSmithKline specifically mentions that they cannot guarantee that their flu vaccine will not damage your fertility: “FLUARIX has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of fertility.”  Thanks to foolishly passed laws by the U.S. government, you will not be able to sue anyone if it does leave you infertile.

#4) GlaxoSmithKline is not alone in using Polysorbate 80.  It is being reported that Novartis is using the adjuvant MF59 in its swine flu vaccine. The MF59 adjuvant contains Tween80 (Polysorbate 80) and squalene among other things.

#5) On the World Intellectual Property Organization, a patent application for a “fertility impairing vaccine”.  The University of Georgia Research Foundation is listed as the patent applicant. 

In the description section of the patent application, Tween 80 (Polysorbate 80) is listed as a preferred ingredient:

“In a preferred embodiment the vaccine comprises oil, preferably a biodegradable oil such as squalene oil, in an amount of about 2.5% to about 15%, preferably about 8% to about 12%. In preparing the vaccine it is advantageous to combine a concentrated oily adjuvant composition with an aqueous solution of the antigen, pZP glycoprotein. Typically, the vaccine is prepared using an adjuvant concentrate which contains lecithin (about 5% to about 15 % wt/vol, preferably about 12% wt/vol) and STDCM (preferably about 25 mg/mL to about 50 mg/mL) in squalene oil. The term % wt/vol means grams per 100 mL of liquid. The aqueous solution containing the isolated pZP glycoprotein is typically a phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution, and additionally preferably contains Tween 80 (about 0.2% vol/vol to about 0.8% vol/vol, preferably about 0.4% vol/vol).”

#6) The United Nations is actively seeking ways to limit and control population growth around the globe.  An incredibly shocking U.N. population division policy brief from March 2009 asked this very disturbing question:

What would it take to accelerate fertility decline in the least developed countries?

You can read this almost unbelievable document here:

http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/UNPD_policybriefs/UNPD_policy_brief1.pdf

The reality is that for the super wealthy global elite and the majority of the social engineers at the United Nations, population control is a major obsession.  If you doubt this fact, just read this article:

http://signsofthelastdays.com/archives/the-radical-population-control-and-eugenics-agenda-of-the-global-elite

The truth is that the more people learn about what is in these vaccines, the less likely they are to take them.  It is important to do your own research before letting anyone inject anything into your body.  Those who blindly trust the government or world health authorities are likely the ones to end up being extremely disappointed in the end.

Gaga mobilizing gay support for latest defense authorization bill

There’s so much absurd news today I can hardly keep up with it!  If I were gay I’d definitely sleep better at night knowing that Gaga supports my right to throw my life away and serve the evil empire.  Gay people, you should want this don’t ask don’t tell policy because it’s an easy out for you if they ever bring back the draft.

This all sounds nice to support gay rights, but this bill also authorizes more money for illegal war, and the DREAM act which gives illegal immigrants green cards if they serve in the military.  They are playing a mind game here with us: “Either you support gays and illegal immigrants in the military, or the military doesn’t get money it needs to operate.”

Why couldn’t these issues be voted on separately from the funding authorization?  They could, but it would be way less confusing that way.  Less opportunity for spin and manipulating public support with mindless jibbering boobs like Gaga

Despite the amateur-looking cinema verité shaking effect, this is military propaganda.  Don’t worry Gaga fans, I’m sure they’ll do whatever it takes to optimize the supply of freash meat for the meat grinder.

What a joke, as if serving in the military and killing innocent people is some kind of a “right.”  If we were attacked, ok (do not dare tell me the terrorists attacked us on 9/11), but who’s out there attacking us?  WHO, GAGA?  TELL ME.    You should be ashamed of yourself.  Total sellout if there ever was one.  You have no soul.

Wellness Enforcement Officer… OPEN UP!!

“Member Engagement” health insurance turns your entire life into a pre-existing condition + Could create new bond/futures market.

On its face, this might seem like a good idea.  Why should I have to pay for someone else’s million dollar liver transplant due to alcohol abuse, or lung cancer surgery after 30 years of smoking? They ruined their own organs willfully.

Unfortunately however, the only way to enforce a “member engagement” system  will be with a new bureaucracy of “health and wellness” lifestyle investigators, monitors, administrators, and medical testing regimes to ensure compliance… to engage the member. Get it?  We’re the members. The insurance companies are preparing to engage us, so brace yourselves.

Once your private medical information is out there, you can’t get it back, and here is a perfect illustration of why it should be kept private and not shared among providers (except as authorized), insurance agencies, or the government.  This type of game-changing, rule-changing behavior by the insurance industry puts nearly everyone at risk for claims denial based on the their subjective assessment of your lifestyle.  It will open the floodgates for a new wave of denials by turning lifestyles into pre-existing conditions.  Death panels?  Of course.  But they they’ll be called wellness assessment panels or something.

If this continues, we’ll be under total nanny state lifestyle micro-management in the name of health and wellness.  It may be privatized or run by a new federal agency. Either way, mandatory health insurance with “member engagement” will have the same result.  Who do you trust, the government or the corporations?  It doesn’t matter because the corporations control the government.  They’ll be working together, to ensure compliance.  Why do you think they made all this federal grant money available to implement electronic health records, while also making it mandatory to buy health insurance?

Did you just hear her say you have to complete a BIOMETRIC SCREENING? This gets scarier every time I watch her read it off the teleprompter but let’s not get off topic.

Member Engagement could create new financial bonds, futures, and derivatives markets, and probably a lot of other smoke and mirrors gambling investment vehicles I’ve never heard of (kind of like investing our savings and retirement money in sub-prime mortgage and derivative markets then going bankrupt).  What does this have to do with me?  Stay with me for a minute…

If the Wall Street bankers can determine the investment value of owning our individual insurance policies, using health and lifestyle data, as opposed to owning group plans as a whole, it could enable the sale of financial contracts based on the health of individuals, that is how likely someone is to need a million dollar surgery before being hit by a bus, and thus whether that individual’s plan will be profitable or costly to administer.  I’m sure the investors and traders are already salivating over this.  Hey, if they can trade penal bonds (not penile), they can trade anything.

To the bureaucrats and social workers that will try to ram this system down our throats– put this in your pipe and smoke it:

I live a healthy lifestyle and rarely see doctors, which is none of your business.  I have no intention of submitting to unnecessary medical testing or sharing information about my lifestyle with you.  If my doctor thinks a procedure or treatment is reasonable and legitimate, s/he will submit a claim with the appropriate billing code. The insurance company will then pay the claim or I will sue them.   It’s obviously not a perfect system now but at least patients have the recourse of a law suit if claims are denied, and the insurance companies are forced to compete in the free market. This Orwellian new insurance model will lead to discrimination law suits if it goes where I think it’s going.

CDC allegedly falsifies reports–ignoring up to 3,587 Miscarriages from H1N1 Vaccine

Progressive Convergence
Friday, September 17, 2010

A shocking report from the National Coalition of Organized Women (NCOW) presented data from two different sources demonstrating that the 2009/10 H1N1 vaccines contributed to an estimated 1,588 miscarriages and stillbirths.  A corrected estimate may be as high as 3,587 cases.  NCOW also highlights the disturbing fact that the CDC failed to inform their vaccine providers of the incoming data of the reports of suspected H1N1 vaccine related fetal demise.

NCOW collected the data from pregnant women (age 17-45 years) that occurred after they were administered a 2009 A-H1N1 flu vaccine. The raw data is available on the website.

Using the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), including updates through July 11, 2010 as a second ascertainment source, capture-recapture statistical methods* were used to estimate the true number of miscarriages and stillbirths following A-H1N1 flu vaccination in the U.S. Typically, even so-called “complete” studies conducted by the CDC have been shown to miss from 10% to 90% of the actual cases because of under-reporting.

The statistical method employed is an expeditious and cost effective method of attempting to ascertain a complete count of all cases when two or more ascertainment sources (VAERS and NCOW survey) have failed to collect all the existing cases. Overall, this approach shows that approximately only 15% of the occurrences of a miscarriage or stillbirth were actually reported.

The corrected estimate for the total number of 2009-A-H1N1-flu-shot-associated miscarriages and stillbirths during the 2009/10-flu season is 1,588 (95% goodness-of-fit confidence interval, 946 to 3587). That is, the lower and upper range-probability of miscarriage and stillbirths due to the H1N1 vaccine was as low as 946 and as high as 3,587.

Eileen Dannemann, Director of NCOW, presented the findings for the second time to Dr. Marie McCormick, chair of the Vaccine Risk and Assessment Working Group, during the Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines (ACCV) meeting, Sept 3, 2010. Just prior to Ms. Dannemann’s presentation Dr. McCormick, had pronounced that there were absolutely no H1N1 vaccine-related adverse events in pregnant women in 2009/10, directly contradicting the evidence publicly available. “This baseless and fallacious assessment by the CDC assessment group” says, Dannemann, “has given the green light to the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) to continue their recommendation to give the 2010/11 flu shot to all people, including pregnant women. This upcoming 2010/11 flu vaccine contains the same elements that are implicated in the killing of these fetuses, the H1N1 viral component and the neurotoxin mercury (Thimerosal). Additionally, it contains 2 other viral strains- a 3 in 1 shot for all people”.

The very next week at the Sept 14^th National Vaccine Advisory Committee (NVAC) meeting Dr. McCormick, (despite having been informed on two previous occasions of the VAERS data) pronounced, once again, that there were no adverse events in pregnant women. At the conclusion of the NVAC meeting, during public comment, Dannemann submitted the data for the 3^rd time and concluded with, “Why hasn’t Dr. McCormick looked in the VAERS data base?”  “She looked where she knew she would not find”, a disquieting thought, Ms. Dannemann, said in retrospect.

Excerpts and adaptation from speech delivered by Eileen Dannemann, Director, National Coalition of Organized Women Friday, September 3, 2010 to the Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines (ACCV) meeting.

“Initially, at the beginning of the H1N1 pandemic consequence management drill there were allegedly 30 maternal deaths.  It was these deaths that the CDC used as the basis to initiate a strenuous and aggressive campaign to vaccinate the pregnant population with the untested H1N1 vaccine.  The CDC ascertained that there were eventually a total of 56 maternal deaths (assuming the fetuses died with them).  Dr. Alicia Siston’s JAMA study (CDC) acknowledged that most of these deaths were ‘unconfirmed’ H1N1 virus caused deaths despite the fact that the CDC had tests that could have verified, for certain, that these were H1N1 related deaths.

Vaccine-related fetal demise reports from VAERS increased 2,440%–from 7 cases in 2007/8 to 178 in 2009/10. Seventy deaths reported from another source had 7 overlapping cases with VAERS, yielding 241 unique cases.  Simplistically speaking, it would have been 85 to 192 times safer not to vaccinate from the perspective of the in-utero child.

Considering that the total of 56 maternal deaths in Dr. Alicia’s Siston’s study, allegedly due to the H1N1 virus itself, are unverified and in light of the overwhelming adverse events reported, we emphasize that inoculating pregnant women with another untested vaccine containing a combination of components found in the offending 2009 H1N1 vaccine is insupportable. Thus, it must be argued that the CDC was grossly negligent to fail to inform their vaccine providers of the incoming VAERS data, while providers blindly followed the CDC “standard of care” guidelines to vaccinate every pregnant woman in 2009/10.  Furthermore, in the face of these findings and the purposeful withholding of these findings by CDC’s Dr. Marie McCormick and her vaccine risk assessment group, for the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) to recommend another iteration of the same vaccine to pregnant women in 2010/11 may be argued as more than gross negligence -but rather- an act of willful misconduct.

We strongly recommend that the CDC withdraws their continued recommendation to pregnant women, instead, strictly adhering to the FDA/manufacturers warning on the insert packages that the flu shot not be given to pregnant women unless clearly needed.  As well, we suggest that the CDC advise all Ob/Gyns, vaccine providers and the public this year, of last season’s VAERS reports on H1N1 vaccine-related fetal deaths” despite the fact that it may be contrary to CDC’s vaccine uptake performance goals”.

*Gary S. Goldman, Ph.D, author of various peer-reviewed medical journal publications, has verified the capture-recapture

(C-R) figures published in the NCOW report.  Dr. Goldman previously worked for 8 years as a Research Analyst for the L.A. County Department of Health Services in an epidemiological study project funded by the CDC.

The Federal Reserve system is a ponzi scheme

A buddy of mine just launched a new informational site about our debt-based fake-money “Federal” “Reserve” system.  It’s a quick 1-page overview of the fundamental flaws in our economy.

Unless we fix these problems our economy will continue its downward spiral into neo-feudalism under banker rule.

Have a look

University-brainwashed-trained economists especially need to read this.

Too much debt…

Revolution Not

I keep saying the US has too much debt.  Being that the USD _IS_ compounding interest mortgage debt (95% of money was created via mortgages) this graph should show what any new stimulus and growth in credit expansion will actually do.  This is especially true if the money is given directly to the banks (with their ability to leverage) instead of reducing debt via money to home owners.  (Giving money to home owners would be a problem for banks as their assets would be reduced!  sigh.)

All the efforts by government and the Fed to make more money is really only pushing on a string they don’t understand.  This time the problem is different.  It’s the same solution to a radically different problem.  This time their efforts are destroying the economy, not fixing it.  I’d argue that all their efforts before were destroying the economy in their own way but at least the problem wasn’t was it is now.  The point I’d like to make on this is that every time the economy went to weed out the unproductive businesses, the fed stepped on the gas.  This only built bad businesses into the economy instead of letting them fall away.  Structurally, what the Fed has done is breed weakness into the economy through it’s policy.  All this weakness needs to be flushed but each passing minimal-recession they had only made this problem worse.  The flushing that we need now (30 years after the Greenspan Put) is going to be so big and bad…  I wouldn’t be surprised if we aren’t already in the starting phases of The Greatest Depression.  This inherent weakness is what we base our economy upon now.

PS.  Numbers and equations don’t tell you what is going on in people’s heads.  Keynesian can’t predict a loss of confidence in the dollar.  Austrian economics is predicting this especially if we continue in our Keynesian ways!

PPS.  Our money is debt regardless of whether you believe it is or not.  How else is it possible that the entire Planet Earth owes more money, to the banks, than exists?

ES&S voting machines “rife with vulnerabilities”

RNA interference (RNAi)

Biotech breakthru could allow temporary control over gene expression

Zero Hedge

.. As the name implies, the technique involves interrupting the function of RNA (ribonucleic acid), one of the key components of all living cells.
…

Once genetic mapping became a reality, researchers quickly discovered that it was possible to sabotage wayward mRNA before it ever gets to the ribosome. All you had to do was synthesize the anti-sense form of the undesirable mRNA and inject it into the cell, where it would bond with the sense sequence automatically, effectively “switching off” the message. If the ribosome can’t read it, you’ve achieved RNA interference, and the offending proteins will never be produced at all.

…

Read more