How to cancel your social security number and birth certificate and become a sovereign citizen

*** Attention: By following these instructions you assume all responsibility and liability for your own actions ***

Namaste to all and of every political persuasion,

We are here today to inform you that you have the right to cancel your Social Security Number and birth certificate… And reclaim your sovereignty from the unconstitutional United States Corporation. Tired of funding these never ending wars and bank/corporate bailouts? Try this!

How to cancel your Social Security Corporation
1) print out IRS form 966: corporate dissolution
2) under the corporation name put MR/MS/MRS/etc as appropriate and then your full name IN ALL CAPS.
3) under EIN put you SSN
4) under return type, check Other and write in “1040″
5) the rest of the info you can figure out.
6) above your signature write “Without Prejudice UCC 1-308″
7) make a copy for your records
8) send it into the IRS

This next year… Instead of filing taxes… Cancel them!

Why does this work? Your Social Security Number is actually a corporation and a second you. This stems from the idea of “corporate personhood.” The idea of giving corporations the rights of natural humans may seem utterly disgusting, but under Black’s legal dictionary the definition of “person” is a natural human or corporation. This is because they are trying to fool people into self identifying as their SSN corporation! Hence the need to give your Statutory person the rights of a natural human.

Another reason why this works is because of UCC 1-308. Please look it up. This is the code that reserves natural human rights and opts out of the UCC that you don’t know about. This is critical to understand because if a judge were to ever ask you what that means, it is only valid if you know. That is to say, presenting this paperwork to a statutory court, and understanding it, means they don’t have jurisdiction… Not only that but you also then have the Constitutional right to have any and all cases seen by a court of common law…. Or have the case dismissed and compensation dispensed for your troubles. You can tell the difference between a statutory court and a common court because statutory courts use American Flags with a gold fringed borders.

Implications:
-Congratulations, you are a sovereign citizen that has reclaimed your constitutional rights!
-Using or claiming to be your invalid SSN is fraud
-You have the right to have all debts be denominated in Constitutional Money: ounces of gold and silver.
-You have the right to work without a SSN
-You have the right to be paid in ounces of gold or silver.
-You have the right to be treated as a corporation without a SSN but only with discrete opt-in consent.
-Filing taxes would be considered fraud due to need to fill in your invalid SSN. They also only collect unconstitutional Fed Notes which is most certainly not constitutional legal tender: gold or silver.
-Figuratively, all account linked to your statutory person are invalidated
-Technically, if gold or silver is offered and declined, the debt itself is nullified. This include mortgages, car loans, credit cards, student loans, federal and state taxes, etc.
-Anyone that calls to collect on an unconstitutional debt linked to your deceased “person”… asking to speak to you…. They are actually asking two questions… Do you still have a personal statutory corporation? And, do you still self-identify as your corporation? It would be fraud to say yes… As your corporation doesn’t exist anymore!
-You have the right to sign up for a new SSN
-No retirement benefits… As if they will be there when most of us retire. Lol
-You have the right to have all court cases seen by a court of common law or have the case dismissed due to the lack of Statutory Jurisdiction. Your corporate Statutory SSN straw-person is how all corporate statutory courts can claim jurisdiction and pull a fast one on us.

As of the time of this writing, most corporations do not accept gold or silver as legal tender. They are abridging our Constitutional Rights. This is why we must start actually going to stores with gold and silver and reclaim our Right to use this form of money.

Some stores accept gold and silver at US mint pressed denominations. This is tax fraud as they would be claiming to the IRS the face value of these coins instead of the IRS regulation of full trade value. These same stores do not recognize the face value of Constitutional bullion even though the face values are almost always present in the form of “one ounce .999 fine silver” or some such depending on the coin or bar.

When gold and silver are declined as tender, they are abridging their own and your own Constitutionally Guaranteed Rights. No one has the authority to abridge these right including store managers, managers in general, directors, CEOs, clerks, judges, and even the President of the (unconstitutional) United States Corporation. Btw, it was Nixon that took us off the gold standard even though he didn’t have the Enumerated Constitutional Right to do so.

It would be great to see #occupy-spend-silver gathering in places like Whole Foods, Target, Lowes, etc, etc. This would be a great way to regain this Guaranteed right.

As far as solutions go for foreclosures… The bankers are most afraid of the #Occupy-my-house aspect of the #occupy movement because that stops their unconstitutional fraudulent business model. FYI, every mortgage is fraud due to breaking double entry accounting standards during loan originations (accounting fraud), the lack of consideration [non-legalese: skin in the game] in every loan by every bank (contract fraud), and the money doesn’t meet the definition of legal tender (constitutional fraud).

All that said, how about our birth certificates? Well, these certificates are actually printed on financial bond certificates. On the back, there is a red number that defines the financial bond, that is you and is publicly traded!

That is to say, corporate personhood is fraud… So is our birth certificate.

How to cancel a birth bond:
1) print out a birth certificate change form; some financial birth bonds have a change form on the back.
2) enter these three field to be changed: State file id number, date of birth, and “name” as per stated on the bond.
3) enter the values as currently indicated
4) leave the change-to values blank
5) find a religious reason for cancelation. Reincarnation is a great reason. The soul is not born when the body is… It existed before and will exist after we pass on. Internet search for a reincarnation quote from a Zen Buddhist/Daoist master and print it out with a statement like “I am canceling my birth certificate because my soul existed before I was born”
6) above your signature write “Without Prejudice UCC 1-308″
7) make a copy for your records
8) send it in to your state location

This terminates the fraud known as the birth bond.

Rat fact: in Commonwealth states their birth certificates call the person a Subject! This is odd given that most people say that the term Commonwealth is simply antiquity. This term traditionally indicates that the territory is literally owned by the Queen of England. Given that Commonwealth citizens are defined as SUBJECTs by their birth bond…. The probability of the term Commonwealth being “just antiquity” is about zero. Subjects are only defined in relation to the Queen… Just like Canada. Non-commonwealth states use more typical terms like “child’s name” or “name.”

Hopefully this helps move things forward for the #Occupy movement.

Thank you for taking the time to consider this… And possibly spreading it around!

Be the love and peace you wish to see. :D

With peace, love, and respect, -Anonymous

Corporations are not people

Sorry, this contains a lot of “liberal this, conservative that” left-right dogma, but it’s an important revelation about the legality of corporate personhood.

Corporate Personhood: First Amendment Rights

revolutionnot.com

Supreme Court OKs unlimited corporate spending on elections (LA Times)

Reporting from Washington – Overturning a century-old restriction, the Supreme Court ruled Thursday that corporations could spend as much as they wanted to sway voters in federal elections.

In a landmark 5-4 decision, the court’s conservative bloc said that corporations had the same right to free speech as individuals, and for that reason the government could not stop corporations from spending to help their favored candidates.

…..

I have so many issues with this that it felt like someone kicked me in the chest. Watching this move through the system was worrisome. This decision has only further solidified the fascist take over of our republic.

I wrote about corporate personhood last year during Sotomayor’s admission into the court. She is very much questioning not just first amendment rights but giving any constitutional rights to corporations.

Once again, the strict constructionist conservative wing of the Supreme Court threw out their ideals and voted to further corporate power and it’s take-over of our government. It’s *($%^ infectious. It’s growing and they have bastardized the US Constitution again.

This is how the strict constructionists strayed to lands beyond from their ideals. Strict Constructionists

“Strict constructionism” is also used in American political discourse as an umbrella term for conservative legal philosophies such as originalism and textualism, which emphasize judicial restraint and fidelity to the original meaning (or originally intended meaning) of constitutions and laws.

The original intent of the constitution nor the 14th Amendment never even considered corporations as actual people. If they had intended Corporations to have the same constitutional rights as individuals they would have written “People and Corporations” throughout the document. In fact, before corporations had personhood, they needed a charter for organization which needed to be continually renewed by each state. That is the original intent of the Constitution.

There are a few arguments for it:

• Investor protection
• Management protection

There are so many arguments against it:

• They have a LOT money, translating into more and more effective speech for corporations
• They enjoy more rights in the form of lower tax rates and then just on profit. This is like taxing Caucasians 20% and everyone else 25%. Secondly, imagine if actual people were only taxed on what we “save” because all living costs were tax deductible? Also, imagine states fighting for your citizenship by giving you incentives like no state taxes for 10 years? These corporate “people” have preferential laws.
• It is a form of double representation. The investors are already represented as themselves. They vote and can put their own money towards a campaign. If you invest in a company but want another canditate to win other than what is being supported by the corporation, then the corporation is not accurately representing you.
• Corporations make false claims and representations. They use their First Amendment Rights to do great harm to the people. A great example of this is the Tobacco and Cigarette Industry claiming that smoking was safe and funding skewed studies.
• Financial Ratings companies like Standard & Poor and Moody say that their financial ratings are opinion and protected by the First Amendment. So, when they rated toxic assets as AAA they had no liability to their word even though the entire financial industry depends on these ratings accuracy. Giving them accountability may actually force them to give securities proper ratings.
• The Constitution cannot be cherry-picked. A real person cannot only have some right in the constitution. A person MUST have all rights. The problem is that corporations are slaves and cannot vote, to name two important conflicts with corporations having the full rights of the constitution.
• A corporation legally must maximize shareholder value. This is the highest law to the corporation and can even be sued by shareholders if found to not be doing this. These include things that could be “to the detriment of people.” Corporations do not have the same priorities as actual people who exist in reality. Two or three times a day, we eat. Without sufficient food we die. Corporations don’t have these daily existential crises

Solutions:

• Force the court to explain why corporations don’t have full First Amendment Rights as people do. Corporations are “artificial people” after all. Justice Clarence Thomas had the clarity to at least do away with this contradiction.
• Force the court to tell us how corporations are not slaves.
• Force the court to tell us how corporations will participate in voting during an election.
• Force the court to tell us how a corporation can use a firearm without any other person helping.
• Force the court to tell us how a corporation can be conscripted into a war if we re-instate the draft.
• Force the court to tell us why corporations younger than 21 can possess alcohol.
• Force the court to tell us why corporations don’t have identification cards like passports or driver licenses.
• Force the court to tell us how to imprison a corporation in a jail.
• Force the court to tell us why corporations owned by foreign entities, including foreign governments, can have rights under our constitution.

Any answers to these questions are purely rationalizations.

I don’t believe any of this can be done because a corporation by itself cannot think, learn, or feel. It cannot be thrown in jail for the lack of physical presence. It cannot pull a lever in a voting booth nor mark any paper. A corporation does not need food or water. It doesn’t even need toilet paper. It does not need to breath and cannot ever be hospitalized. A corporation never came out of a vagina (or c-section) nor must it eventually die. It cannot use a firearm. It is not conscious and can only act through proxies.

or we could just,
Remove corporate personhood. Singapore doesn’t have corporate personhood and, while investment and growth is hampered, it still has a thriving economy where the risk of corporations is priced, truly, into its market value.

I’m not quite sure how corporate protection should look but we can cross that bridge when we get to it.

My last point is that this ruling clearly flies in the face of stare-decisis. This was an important aspect to confirming the Supreme Court Judges Alito and Roberts in the Judiciary Committee of Congress.