The Sharp Dressed Man Who Aided Mutallab Onto Flight 253 Was a U.S. Government Agent

Kurt Haskell
Prison Planet.com
Saturday, January 30, 2010

Please note that in the article that follows, I am not claiming that the U.S. Government knew Mutallab had a bomb or intended to hurt anyone on Flight 253 when the U.S. Government let him board.

	Umar Farouk Abulutallab.

Since our flight landed on Christmas Day, Lori and I have been doing everything in our power to uncover the truth about why we were almost blown up in the air over Detroit. The truth is now finally out after the publication of the following Detroit News article:

http://detnews.com/article/20100127/NATION/1270405/Terror-suspect-kept-visa-to-avoid-tipping-off-larger-investigation

Let me quote from the article:

“Patrick F. Kennedy, an undersecretary for management at the State Department, said Abdulmutallab’s visa wasn’t taken away because intelligence officials asked his agency not to deny a visa to the suspected terrorist over concerns that a denial would’ve foiled a larger investigation into al-Qaida threats against the United States.

“Revocation action would’ve disclosed what they were doing,” Kennedy said in testimony before the House Committee on Homeland Security. Allowing Adbulmutallab to keep the visa increased chances federal investigators would be able to get closer to apprehending the terror network he is accused of working with, “rather than simply knocking out one solider in that effort.”‘

Now it all becomes apparent. Let me detail everything we know about the “Sharp Dressed Man” (SDM).

1. While being held in Customs on Christmas Day, I first told the story of the SDM.

2. My story has never changed.

3. The FBI visited my office on December 29, 2009, and showed me a series of approximately 10 photographs. None were of the SDM. I asked the FBI if they brought the Amsterdam security video to help me identify the SDM, but they acted as though my request was ridiculous. The FBI asked me what accent the SDM spoke in and I indicated that he had an American accent similar to my own. I further indicated that he wore a tan suit without a tie, was Indian looking, around age 50, 6′0″ tall and 250-260 lbs. I further indicated that I did not believe that he was an airline employee and that he was not on our flight.

4. During the first week of January, 2010, Dutch Military Police and the FBI indicated that over “200 Hours” of Amsterdam airport security video had been reviewed and it “Shows Nothing”.

5. The mainstream media picked up the “Shows nothing” story, which slanders my story. After visiting my office twice for a flight 253 special, Dateline NBC and Chris Hanson indicated that my story was “Unsubstantiated rumor dispelled as myth” and our story did not air during the tv special.

6. On January 2, 2010, I receive a call from a flight 253 passenger who indicated to me that it may be in my best interest to stop talking publicly about the SDM because he believes I am “wrong” in what I saw. He did not make any claim that he saw the SDM boarding gate incident at all. This call was made out of the blue after he made a “revelation” of this event on January 1, 2010. I later discover that this caller has ties to the U.S. Government.

7. On January 20, 2009, current Director of the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC), Michael E. Leiter, made a startling admission. Leiter indicated that: “I will tell you, that when people come to the country and they are on the watch list, it is because we have generally made the choice that we want them here in the country for some reason or another.”

8. On January 22, 2010, CongressDaily reported that intelligence officials “have acknowledged the government knowingly allows foreigners whose names are on terrorist watch lists to enter the country in order to track their movement and activities.”

CongressDaily also reported, citing an unnamed “intelligence official” that Michael E. Leiter’s statement on January 20, 2010, reflected government policy and told the publication, “in certain situations it’s to our advantage to be able to track individuals who might be on a terrorist watch list because you can learn something from their activities and their contacts.”

9. On Janury 22, 2009, ABC News published an article that shoed a change of position in the government’s official story. Please see the following blog post for more information:

http://haskellfamily.blogspot.com/2010/01/initially-discounted.html

The U.S. government provided no explanation for the reason my story was initially discounted.

10. The SDM could not be from Al Qaeda. When speaking at the counter in Amsterdam, the SDM said the following “He is from Sudan, we do this all the time”. Who is “we”? If it is Al Qaeda, you surely don’t make such a statement to an airposrt security official.

11. The SDM could not be from airport security. The SDM did not dress in any secuirty uniform and did not appear to have any security badge. The SDM did not speak with a Dutch accent. The SDM dressed in a suit coat and pants. If the SDM was a higher up security official, he would not have to convince the ticket agent to let Mutallab on the plane without a valid passport. Instead, he would just order her to do it.

12. Could the SDM have been a U.S. Government official? He dressed in a suit and not a security uniform. Check. He indicated we do this all the time. Could “we” be the U.S. Government? Check. He spoke Enlish with an American accent. Check. Would he need to convice the ticket agent that this was a normal procedure to allow boarding without a passport? Check. Would he have the ability to obtain such clearance? Check. Could he enter this security area even though he wasn’t a passenger? Check. Would the ticket agent likely refer this request to a manager? Check. Would the U.S. Government not want this information public and try to hide it? Check.

13. The Amsterdam security video has not been released. A much more minor airport security violation occurred at the Newark New Jersay airport several days after the flight 253 incident. That video was released shortly thereafter.

14. Senators Levin and Stabenow, as well as Congressman Dingle, all refuse to discuss the matter with me.

With the information we already knew and the admission from the above referenced Detroit News article, we have evidence and claims made by government officials that the U.S. Government wanted Mutallab to proceed into the U.S. in order to obtain information on other terrorists involved with him. Once we take this statement and add it to my eyewitness account of a “Sharp Dressed Man” escorting Mutallab through the boarding process and allowing him to baord without a valid passport we can make the connection that the “Sharp Dressed Man” was a U.S. Government offical/agent.

The reasoning behind the following events now becomes very clear:

1. The reason Mutallab got through security despite the numerous warnings for months before our flight.

2. The reason why there have been so many lies from the U.S. Governemnt attempting to discredit my eyewitness account.

3. The reason why the Amsterdam airport security video is being hidden from the public.

4. The reason why the government is proposing a “Failed to Connect the Dots” account of the failure. The truth is too damning.

5. The reason why Mr. Wolf of the Obama administration indicated on the Keith Olberman Show that the White House was investigating a possible “intentional act” from within the U.S. Government as the reason for the Christmas Day attack.

6. The explanation for the cameraman and why he hasn’t been identified (Obviously, he was another U.S. Government agent) whose job was to film Mutallab for some governmental purpose.

7. The reason for the lax security after landing, which can be attributed to foreknowledge of the possible suspects involved.

8. The reason for the failure to search or secure the plane and passengers after landing, which can also be attributed to foreknowledge of the possible suspects involved.

9. The corporate media’s attempt to bury my eyewitness account.

10. Carl Levin’s, Debbie Stabenow’s and John Dingle’s intentional avoidance of my story and failure to return my calls/emails.

11. Janet Naploitano’s statement that “The System Worked”. From her point of view it probably did as this WAS PART OF THE SYSTEM!

Bombshell Eyewitness Account of Flight 253 Attack

Infowars

Editor’s note: Detroit attorney Kurt Haskell dropped bombshell revelations concerning his eyewitness experience of the Flight 253 attack and how the FBI detained a second man after dogs detected a bomb in his luggage on The Alex Jones Show today. The FBI has not only ignored Haskell’s story, but they have launched a cover-up by refusing to even acknowledge the existence of another man who filmed the entire flight, including the aborted attack, as well as the well-dressed man who aided the bomber to board the plane even though he had no passport and was on a terror watch list.

Kurt Haskell.

Watch this space for more stories on this astounding news that the corporate media has completely failed to cover.

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
December 29, 2009

Detroit attorney Kurt Haskell appeared on the Alex Jones Show today and detailed his experience at the Amsterdam airport and on flight 253. Mr. Haskell provided information not covered by the corporate media.

In addition to a detailed retelling of the story he gave the corporate media, Mr. Haskell addressed the unprofessional and lackadaisical behavior of the FBI and airport security after the plane landed at the Detroit Metro airport in Romulus, Michigan. He characterized their behavior as a “complete embarrassment. They actually put us in more jeopardy than we were already in.”

Passengers were told to remain seated in the aircraft for 20 minutes after landing despite the fact security did not know at that point if there was an explosive on the plane or if the fire started by the suspect Umar Farouk Abdul Mutallab while on descent to the airport had spread under the floor in the cabin or to the fuel tanks in the wings.

After being allowed to disembark from the plane by officials, passengers were detained in customs with their carry-on luggage for six hours while they waited to be interrogated by the FBI, according to Haskell.

At this point a bomb-sniffing dog pointed at carry-on luggage in the possession of a man Haskell described as Indian around 30 years old. Officials led the man away to an interrogation room. Haskell said he was concerned because the bomb-sniffing dog had flagged the man, indicating he may have had explosives in his carry-on luggage. The Indian man was subsequently led away in handcuffs.

Following this incident the FBI moved the passengers to another location. “You’re being moved,” the FBI told them, “it is not safe here. I’m sure you all saw what happened and can read between the lines and why you’re being moved.”

Haskell said the corporate media refuses to cover this aspect of his story. He has repeated it to “countless” news agencies and they uniformly have not included it to his knowledge.

Mr. Haskell questioned why officials have not released the Amsterdam airport security video that will undoubtedly reveal crucial information about the “sharp-dressed man” who escorted a disheveled Mutallab to the boarding area. Haskell described the suspected terrorist as appearing to be a “poor black teenager.”

The well-dressed Indian man did all the talking. He insisted Mutallab be boarded on the plane without a passport and when an airport employee refused to do so Mutallab and the Indian man went to talk with a supervisor. The Indian man tried to pass off Mutallab as a Sudanese refugee and have him boarded despite the fact doing so would be in violation of regulations concerning refugees. In general, documentation must be provided by an embassy in order for refugees to board international flights.

Mr. Haskell did not see Mutallab again until the botched terror bombing inside the plane on the approach to Detroit. He did not know how Mutallab finally boarded the aircraft.

The FBI was not pleased with Kurt Haskell when they conducted a follow-up interview earlier today in Michigan. They showed him close-up photographs of various people, including Mutallab. “They kind of tried to trick me,” Haskell explained. The agents tried to pass off two photos of Mutallab as different people. Kurt asked the agents if they were attempting to impeach his story and smear him.

The Indian man was not included in the photographs.

Haskell asked them why he was not shown a full body shot of the suspect. Haskell was eight rows back from the suspect. The FBI agents did not answer and were displeased with the question. He also asked the FBI agents if it would be more appropriate to bring the surveillance video from the Amsterdam airport instead of still photos. “I don’t think they liked that comment from me,” Haskell added. The FBI said they did not have the videotape. They also made a point to tell Haskell they were asking the questions and not him.

The agents showed Haskell a photograph of the man flagged by the bomb-sniffing dog and taken into custody in customs. “Isn’t this the man who had the bomb in his carry-on bag that you arrested in customs who you refuse to admit exists?” Haskell asked the agents. “They really didn’t like that comment from me and had no comment back to me but I said it sure looks like the man you refuse to admit exists.”

Kurt Haskell was circumspect and careful not to speculate during the interview with Alex Jones. He indicated he is only interested in the facts and does not want to endanger his version of events by speculating on motives.

Corporate media interviews with the Haskells.

Image anaysis casts doubt on authenticity of NAU currency images

Although I don’t agree that this amounts to 100% proof, it raises some valid questions and leaves me even more dubious about about this supposed NAU currency submitted by a Federal Jack reader.

via Revolutionnot.com

The image:
FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE SPECIMENS
THE FINAL REVISION – 2010 SERIES – INITIAL PRINTING
(The front face on the left, the back with image on the right. 1, 5, 10, 20 50, 100, 200)
PRETRIAL SPECIMENS ONLY – NOT AUTHORIZED FOR CIRCULATION OR PUBLIC RELEASE
PNISHABLE UNDER THE USC TITLE 18, PART I, CHAPTER 17, § 334

The text here says to me that these claim to be scans of actual bills off the printing press. How true is this? Let’s find out!

Only one other country has a 200 unit note: Switzerland. To counter balance this, the only other $200 bill was fake and had G.W. Bush on it.

The One unit bill has UNO written on the back over the lower left numeral. No other denomination here has any Spanish text so prominent. That would be an important usability feature for transactions.

There is no currency specified. All these NAU bills say the denomination but not the currency. Euros even say ‘EYPΩ’ (The Greek spelling of ‘EURO’) in addition to ‘EURO’. If it said Ameros on it or some other unnamed currency, then I’d believe it.

The image was “created” by Picasa 3.0. It’s in the JPEG Header. I doubt anyone at the Federal Reserve Manages enough images to warrant a photo manager. Even then, they wouldn’t use Picasa due to its social features and the security risks that poses with something so sensitive. You can basically click a button and share the image with the world. They wouldn’t allow this. Not at all. Having worked at a large financial institution, unauthorized software is punishable by explicit and swift firing. There may have been an intermediary that used Picasa and it resaved the file with it’s own heading, but it’s very dubious.

The text around the illuminati symbol says: “Domus Aedificata est” and “Novus Ordo Mundi” which translates to “This house was built for me” and “New World Order,” respectively. The Roman date below the illuminati pyramid is 1776 which has no NAU meaning. The influence of the Federal Reserve in these bills would make 1913 a much more important date to signify under the illuminati.

The current US bills have a marking on them to describe their location in the sheet. Here are samples of these bills where you can clearly see the location in the sheet at the bottom of each snapshot.

Here are the sheet position markings on these bills:

• 1 – L1
• 5 – A4
• 10 – A2
• 20 – A1
• 50 – A7
• 100 – G1
• 200 – F3

If these bills were printed they were pulled randomly out of each stack for the scan. There is a chance of this happening. The damning evidence is if these bills were produced from the same presses as our US Dollar Bills are printed now, there is no such position as L1 nor A7 unless the one unit and fifty unit paper is exactly twice the size. Together, the paper would be 4 times the normal size. In other words, to get a bill in position L7 the paper would be huge (as in, four times the normal size). This is not how bills are printed. These things are standardized for efficiency, quality, and cost.

The fact that there are bankers and important people to the Federal Reserve on the bills is utter non-sense. This would never happen. There is too much pent up anger at banks in North America (all over the world really) and no one would stand for it. Most people have no idea who these people are!

• 1 – Charles S. Hamlin – First Chairman of the Federal Reserve.
• 5 – Nelson Wilmarth Aldrich – Politician instrumental in setting up the Federal Reserve.
• 10 – William Gibbs McAdoo – U.S. Senator, United States Secretary of the Treasury and director of the United States Railroad Administration. Served as an “ex-officio member” on the first Federal Reserve Board.
• 20 – Edward Mandell House – Laid the groundwork for establishment of the Council on Foreign Relations.
• 50 – Paul Moritz WarburgHelp to found of the Federal Reserve System. He was appointed a member of the first Federal Reserve Board.
• 100 – John D. Rockefeller Advocated for the Federal Reserve (at least)
• 200 – John Pierpont Morgan The most powerful banker before the Federal Reserve System

There are a number of elements that “show through” the bills and when comparing them, some elements are missing. One side is much more transparent than the other. The most interesting evidence is that the partial numbers on the two sides of all the bills don’t form a perfect number while the text “THE UNITED FEDERATION OF NORTH AMERICA” is exactly lined up with the background fade of the opposite text. This technique exactly lines up so you can read the denomination very clearly when holding a bill up to the light including in the Euro. A notable point is that the “faded see-through” of the number pieces an each side is a perfect denomination despite the fact that superimposing an aligned, flipped reverse side does not produce a perfect denomination. Each side suggests the see through nature and point out that it does line up but when you actually put it together these elements to not line up.

On the left is the Photoshop combined 50-50 faded overlay of the two sides, one side is horizontally flipped so it overlays as if you were to look through it with light on the other side. It’s completely out of alignment. Yet, as you can see from the middle and right, each denomination on each side clearly ghosts through as the whole number.

This holds true for the denomination security strip in each bill as well. Superimposing lines on each side places this strip in very different places The one and five is almost there, but all the others are way off. This is the 100 bill. The strips have been highlighted in red and blue to show you how off they are. You can see the ghost of the strips without the color overlay.

For clarity you can look at this enhanced image too. This is darkened to show you the see through ghosting of the reverse side a bit better.

Lastly, the bill positions on the supposed sheet of tens are all A2. This is not how they would be labeled. If this was a pretrial print run, they’d most likely do the actual bill positions in the sheet so as to test that aspect of the printing system.

Given this analysis… I’m going to step out and say these bills are 100% fake. Clearly, the person or organization spent a lot of time trying to get it right but there are a lot of “mistakes” that an actual printed bill would not have. Any graphic designer worth their salt would have caught these mistakes. This leads me to believe they were purposefully placed there. People without the analysis ability would start speculating. People with the ability would scan the bills and say, yeah, maybe they’re real. Anyone doing real analysis would find the mistakes. These flaws are so obvious that they almost WANT people to know it’s fake.

This begs the question why go through this exercise? Who would do such a thing?

My best guess is that this is some kind of CoIntelPro. It’s an attempt to discredit the conspiracy theorists. Police use these techniques all the time. They infiltrate a group of peaceful protestors and cause violence and havoc which allows the riot police to move in with the fake reason of crowd control. But what is the purpose here?

Hal Turner a Trained FBI Agent Provocateur

I’ve been saying this for a year or more.  Only an agent of the government would be allowed to stay on the airwaves inciting violence without prosecution for that long.  And that elaborate amero hoax, with real fabricated coins– it was too high budget for some lone nut blogger.

Beware patriots, they internet is crawling with pr agents, racist provocateurs, fake bloggers, and software for manipulating social bookmark sites.

Radio talk show host and blogger Hal Turner was an FBI trained agent provocateur, his attorney told reporters in Hartford today. The supposed white supremacist worked for the agency from 2002 until 2007. “His job was basically to publish information which would cause other parties to act in a manner which would lead to their arrest,” Michael Orozco told the Associated Press.

Earlier this year Turner told his blog readers to “take up arms” against Connecticut lawmakers. He also said government officials should “obey the Constitution or die.” In June he wrote that the Illinois federal appeals judges “deserve to be killed” because they issued a ruling that upheld ordinances in Chicago and suburban Oak Park banning handguns. Turner included photos of the judges and the room numbers of their chambers at the courthouse.

Orozco said he plans First Amendment defenses in both the Connecticut and Illinois cases.

Under COINTELPRO in the 1960s and early 70s, the FBI used a variety of dirty tricks against its targets including wiretapping and assassination — as well as the use of agents provocateurs — in coordination with state and local police.

As the case against Turner and the revelations of his attorney reveal, the government did not abandon its COINTELPRO tactics, as it claimed in the mid 1970s. The FBI, acting as the establishment’s political secret police, continues to undermine political movements the elite consider dangerous and a threat to their control and influence.

Members of the patriot movement in particular should take note of Turner’s revelations. The government is not interested in subverting the globalist foundation comprised and neutered so-called left but rather a growing patriot movement that demands an end to the Federal Reserve, a return to a constitutional republic, and resistance to predatory globalism and world government.

Hal Turner specifically attempted to appeal to the patriot movement and the constitutionalists. It should serve as a wake-up call that the FBI trained him as an agent provocateur.

Amero Hoax Exposed

10-27-08
by Mark Dice
www.TheResistanceManifesto.com

Let me just give everyone a heads up about a huge Amero hoax and disinformation campaign started by Hal Turner, a white supremacist hate monger and former host of an internet radio show.  More on Turner’s dark past and motives in a bit.

On October 4th 2008, Turner posted a video on his YouTube channel, titled Hal Turner Shows New AMERO Currency, where he claims to have in his possession an actual Amero coin.  He also claims that America sent 800 billion dollars of the new coins to China in preparation for the collapse of the U.S. Dollar.  The video is located here:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ge2J2lNusJs

The video has nearly 400,000 views, and I saw a copy of it at the number one spot on the Google Video’s top 100 list last week.  Not only is Turner wrong about having an actual Amero coin, but he is purposefully lying about it in an attempt to create the idea that a regional currency, likely to be called the Amero, is a hoax and something American’s don’t need to worry about or look into.

Anyone can purchase a “novelty replica” Amero from www.AmeroCurrency.com or www.DC-Coin.com.   In his video where he claims to have an actual Amero, the camera zooms in on the front and back of the coin to show the designs as he attempts to “prove” its authenticity.  And guess what?  It is EXACTLY like the replicas sold on the web.

One might be led to believe that Turner is simply mistaken, and that he actually thinks he has a real Amero coin, because the Council on Foreign Relations and other New World Order organizations have been planning such a thing for years.  One might think that he just didn’t do his research, and believes his story.  This is simply not true.

Last year, Turner posted pictures on his website of what he claimed to be “real” Amero coins that he had obtained.  He plastered his website name, HalTurnerShow.com on the pics, knowing that people would spread them all over the web and give him free advertising by spreading his name.

A quick Google search shows anyone that the pictures of the coins were taking from the various websites that create novelty coins and replicas.  Countless people must have emailed him to point this out to him, as did the comments on his blog post.  Then, one year later, Turner obtains a replica, and then posts a video blog claming to have an actual coin!

Posting comments on the video on his YouTube channel has been disabled by him.  He obviously saw that people were posting comments about replica coins being made and sold on the internet.   So this leads to the question of why.  Why would he do such a thing, when he claims to be a concerned citizen and former radio host?

Turner has a history of urging and hoping for violence against others, including judges, and has posted their home addresses on his website and written blogs celebrating their murders.  The Southern Poverty Law center and others report that Turner is an FBI informant, and many suspect he is a paid provocateur and a cointelpro asset.

At the end of July 2008 Turner was forced to quit his radio show and abandon his website due to constant attacks from the hacking group known as Anonymous.  These are the same hackers that have targeted Scientology for its corrupt and litigious nature.  The hackers kept causing Turner to have outrageous bandwidth costs, which ultimately forced him to shut down and give up his radio show.

One can see how a large percentage of the nearly 400,000 viewers of the video will believe him at first that the Ameros are already being coined, only to later dismiss the idea of the U.S. Dollar collapsing and being replaced by a new currency because it turns out the video was a hoax.  A classic case of disinformation.  Mixing facts with fiction, in an attempt to prevent the public from focusing on the impact of such issues that we will ultimately face in the near future.