Study: Water fluoridation provides no detectable benefit in rural populations

West Virginia Rural Health Research Center published a population study in January of 2012 which shows that municipal water fluoridation provides no benefit to children’s teeth.  In areas where water fluoridation was less prevalent, and dental care was also less accessible, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of cavities when compared to urban populations.

“For children’s dental health measures, it was found that fluoridation rates were not significantly related to the measures of either caries or overall condition of the teeth for urban or rural areas.”

Read the study here: 2011 fluoridation policy brief (PDF)

While their conclusions seem rather desperate to soften the blow against the crumbling fluoride dogma, the data is consistent with World Health Organization statistics which show little to no benefit to fluoridation when comparing countries that do and do not fluoridate water and/or salt.

That’s right, it’s all about brushing, flossing, the foods you eat, and genetics.  No amount of toxic fluoride makes up for inadequate dental hygiene especially after consuming sweet and acidic foods.

Doctors Joseph Mercola and Bill Osmunson discuss the public health effects of fluoride

The many uses of fluorides

Fluorine is the most electronegative of all elements. It is highly reactive due to this strong tendency to accept electrons and form covalent bonds with other atoms, creating molecules.

Elemental fluorine is acutely toxic, and all the fluorides (molecules containing fluorine plus other elements) have negative charge, and are biologically active and toxic to some extent.

Many industrial and chemical processes rely on fluorides. Here are a few of them.  Anyone else find this unsettling?

Fluorosilicic acid and aluminum fluoride in smelting aluminum
Lithium and sodium fluoride in aluminum manufacturing as flux
Uranium hexafluoride for production of enriched uranium
Hydrogen fluoride as a catalyst in oil refining
Fluorinated quinolone antibiotics like Cipro
Antidepressant drugs like Prozac (Fluoxetine) and Paxil (Paroxetine)
Sulfuryl fluoride as an agricultural pesticide
Fluorosilicic acid and sodium fluoride in tap water …. “for your teeth”
Sodium or calcium fluoride in toothpaste
Sodium fluoroacetate and Sodium fluoride as a rodenticide (often placed around food crops)

So … Sodium fluoroacetate and fluoride will kill bugs and rats, but they’re GOOD FOR YOU.  GET IT?  NOW SHUT UP AND PUT IT IN YOUR MOUTH.

There is absolutely no biological need for fluoride in humans.  A human can survive, and will be more healthy with zero fluoride intake.  International (World Health Organization) data shows that tooth decay has declined at similar rates both in countries that do and don’t fluoridate municipal water.  But to be cautious, we should not conclude based on this that fluoride doesn’t reduce tooth decay, because so much of it has bioaccumulated in our environment and food chain that most people are getting high levels from food, so additional fluoride from water puts their intake at dangerous levels.

A reliable Qbit.cc source inside Glaxo Smith Kline (pharmaceutical company) recently stated that “They put fluoride in almost everything, even inerts.”  Considering that all fluorides are biologically active to some extent, calling anything with fluorine in it inert is an outright lie.

They have to lie though, because they have to keep giving us our vitamin F.  It’s part of a bigger agenda that you don’t want to know about, so you probably didn’t even make it this far before mind control programming was activated, causing you to recall lines from Dr. Strangelove or something else on TV, become agitated and stop reading.

I left out the citations and I’m not going to get into all the horrible stuff it does to your body, because this is just a quick rant.  If you want some documentation just page thru the fluoride tag.  Therein you’ll find dozens of scientific abstracts and articles.

Bottoms up, slave ;)

See also: “Inerts” used in Pesticides. New Source of Fluoride Exposure.

P.S.  Feel free to repost this or print the above image on stickers.

Fluoride makes populations submissive

(Mind Trek) Valdamar Valerian, July 20, 1996

… At the end of the World War II, the United States Government sent Charles E. Perkins, a research worker in chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and pathology, to take charge of the vast I.G. Farben chemical plants in Germany [ 34 ]. While there, Perkins was told by German chemists of a scheme which had been worked out by them during the war and adopted by the German General Staff, which was to control the population in any given area through mass medication of drinking water [ 35 ]. In this scheme, sodium fluoride occupied a prominent place. Repeated doses of infinitesmal amounts of fluoride will in time reduce an indivdual’s power to resist domination by slowly poisoning and narcotising a certain area of the brain, and will make him submissive to the will of those who wish to govern him [ 36 ]. The social effect was that it made it more difficult for a person to defend his freedom. Both the Germans and Soviets (1940) added sodium fluoride to the drinking water of prisoners of war to make them stupid and docile [ 37 ]. It is also a well known fact among breeders of purebred bulls that the administration of fluorides makes the bull more submissive and easier to handle [ 38 ].

According to Senator Ambruster in his magnificent tome Treason’s Peace – German Dyes and American Dupes (1947), one of the largest producers of fluorides as a hazardous waste by-product was the Aluminium Company of America (ALCOA), who had a 1931 agreement with I.G. Farben in Germany, as did Dow Chemical Company (1933) to restrict American production of materials vital to the U.S. war effort. Other companies such as Imperial Chemical Industries (ICI, England), DuPont, Standard Oil (Rockefeller, who contributed war materials and money to Hitler), American Cyanamid and Sterling-Winthrop-Bayer were Farben associates. Indictments were filed against several of these companies on January 30, 1941, covering conspiracy, but inside forces spent so much effort at softening up the Justice Department (which is still corrupt today) to prevent prosecution that by April 15, 1942, all the defendants pleaded nolo contendre (“oh, well, what if we did?”) and paid fines of $25,000 each. It is also a fact that I.G. Farben itself was indicted, but the case never came to court. Some of Farben’s leading subsidiaries in the U.S. were General Aniline and Film (GAF), American I.G., and Bayer, but it was their associate ALCOA which figured prominently in the introduction of fluoride wastes from aluminum production (difficult of dispose of), quickly joined by LCI (Florida) and other fertilizer industries who had fluoride by-products classified by the EPA as hazardous waste [ 39 ].

According to scientist Charles Perkins, in a 1954 letter to the Lee Foundation for Nutritional Research, Milwaukee, Wisconsin:

“We are told by the fanatical ideologists who are advocating the fluoridation of the water supplies in this country that their purpose is to reduce the incidence of tooth decay in children, and it is the plausibility of this excuse, plus the gullability of the public and the cupidity of public officials that this is responsible for the present spread of artificial water fluoridation in this country. However, and I want to make this very definite and very positive: the real reason behind water fluoridation is not to benefit children’s teeth. If this were the real reason, there are many ways in which it could be done that are much easier, cheaper and far more effective. The real purpose behind water fluoridation is to reduce the resistance of the masses to domination, control and loss of liberty. When the Nazis decided to go into Poland, the German General Staff and the Russian General Staff exchanged scientific and military ideas, plans and personnel, and also the sheme of mass control through water medication was seized upon by the Russian Communists because it fitted ideally into their plan to Communize the world. I say this with all earnestness and sincerity of a scientist who has spend nearly 20 years research into the chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and pathology of fluorine — any person who drinks artificially fluoridated water for a period of one year or more will never again be the same person, mentally or physically.” [ 40 ]

[Unfortunately, the ctations are unavailable. Please post a commnet if you can locate them.]

See also: A Chronology of Fluoridation [pdf]

Fluoride Spill At Illinois Water Facility Requires Haz-Mat Response, But It’s Ok To Drink

CNN: Government Recommends Lowering Fluoride Levels in U.S. Drinking Water

This is a partial victory but we need to continue to aggressively pursue total elimination of fluoride in drinking water. Notice they still will not discuss the brain damage and fertility issues associated with water fluoridation.

Friday, January 7, 2011

(CNN) — The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency are recommending changing for the first time in nearly 50 years the amount of fluoride allowed in drinking water because of an increase in fluorosis — a condition that causes spotting and streaking on children’s teeth.

The government is proposing that the recommended amount for fluoride in drinking water be set at 0.7 milligrams per liter of water. The proposal would replace the current recommended range of 0.7 to 1.2 milligrams per liter, which has been in place since 1962. The EPA will determine whether the maximum amount of fluoride allowed in water will also be lowered.

Fluoride was first added to water in the United States in the 1940s to help prevent tooth decay in children 8 years and under, considered the tooth-forming years.

Read more…

How much Colgate toothpaste would it take to kill a child?

Fluoridealert.org created this convenient table…

… toothpaste-induced fatalities have been rarely reported in the US. In a review of Poison Center Control reports between 1989 and 1994, 12,571 reports were found from people who had ingested excess toothpaste. Of these calls, 2 people – probably both children – experienced “major medical outcomes”, defined as “signs or symptoms that are life-threatening or result in significant residual disability or disfigurement” (SOURCE: Shulman 1997).

TABLE: “Colgate for Kids” Toothpaste could Kill your Child
Age of Child	Average Weight*	Dose of Fluoride which could kill**	Percent of “Colgate for Kids” toothpaste which, if swallowed, could Kill***
2 years	~12 kg	60 mg	~42% of tube
3 years	~15 kg	75 mg	~53% of tube
4 years	~16 kg	80 mg	~56% of tube
5 years	~ 18 kg	90 mg	~63% of tube
6 years	~20 kg	100 mg	~70% of tube
7 years	~22 kg	110 mg	~77% of tube
8 years	~25 kg	125 mg	~87% of tube
9 years	~28 kg	140 mg	~98% of tube
*Average weight data obtained here ** Potentially fatal dose = 5 mg of fluoride per kg of bodyweight. This is “the minimum dose that could cause toxic signs and symptoms, including death, and that should trigger immediate therapeutic intervention and hospitalization… This does not mean that doses lower than 5.0 mg F/kg should be regarded as innocuous.” (SOURCE: Journal of Dental Research 1987; 66:1056-1060.) *** The fluoride concentration in Colgate for Kids toothpaste is 1,100 ppm. At 130 grams of paste in the average tube, this equals 143 milligrams of fluoride.

Indian Children Blinded, Crippled By Fluoride In Water

Growing awareness of mass medication of public with deadly neurotoxin leads to establishment backlash

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Wednesday, June 23, 2010

The controversy over adding sodium fluoride to water supplies in both the U.S. and the UK is intensifying as two separate stories out of India reveal that children are being blinded and crippled partly as a result of the neurotoxin being artificially added to drinking water.

In the Indian village of Gaudiyan, well over half of the population have bone deformities, making them physically handicapped. Children are born normally but after they start drinking the fluoridated water, they begin to develop crippling defects in their hands and feet.

“Due to the excess fluoride content in drinking water, the calcium intake is not absorbed in the body, causing disabilities and deformities,” said Dr Amit Shukla, a neurophysician.

“Sijara, a 35-year-old woman who is also afflicted, said the problem started around 30 years ago and gradually gripped the entire village,” reports Express India. “Now, you hardly find a person without the deformities. People in the village die at a relatively young age,” added Sijara whose three sons also have physical deformities.”

Government doctors have denied that fluoridation of drinking water is to blame, but have refused to test the water, insisting such tests are “not necessary”.

Meanwhile, in the village of Pavagada, 180 km from Bangalore, children are going blind after being diagnosed with Lamellar Congenital cataract — a condition wherein the eye lens are damaged.

“Alarmed by the pattern in eye diseases among children in Pavagada taluk and the increasing cases of blindness, Narayana Netralaya, in collaboration with Narayana Hrudalaya and Shree Sharada Devi Eye hospital and Research Centre in Pavagada, has begun one of the largest studies on eye disorders involving 29,800 children,” reports the Times of India in a piece entitled, Blinded by tradition and fluoride in water.

The doctors attribute the child blindness to two factors – consanguineous marriages and the “fluoride content” of the drinking water.

Christopher Bryson’s widely acclaimed book The Fluoride Deception includes dozens of peer-reviewed studies showing that sodium fluoride is a deadly neurotoxin that attacks the central nervous system and leads to a multitude of serious health problems. This fact has been covered up by a collusion of government and industry who have reaped financial windfalls while illegally mass medicating the public against their will.

Perhaps the most notable study was conducted by Dr. Phyllis Mullenix Ph.D., a highly respected pharmacologist and toxicologist, who in a 1995 Forsyth Research Institute study found that rats who had fluoride added to their diet exhibited abnormal behavioral traits.

A 2008 Scientific American report concluded that “Scientific attitudes toward fluoridation may be starting to shift” as new evidence emerged of the poison’s link to disorders affecting teeth, bones, the brain and the thyroid gland, as well as lowering IQ.

“Today almost 60 percent of the U.S. population drinks fluoridated water, including residents of 46 of the nation’s 50 largest cities,” reported Scientific American’s Dan Fagin, an award-wining environmental reporter and Director of New York University’s Science, Health and Environmental Reporting Program.

The Scientific American study “Concluded that fluoride can subtly alter endocrine function, especially in the thyroid — the gland that produces hormones regulating growth and metabolism.”

The report also notes that “a series of epidemiological studies in China have associated high fluoride exposures with lower IQ.”

“Epidemiological studies and tests on lab animals suggest that high fluoride exposure increases the risk of bone fracture, especially in vulnerable populations such as the elderly and diabetics,” writes Fagin.

Fagin interviewed Steven Levy, director of the Iowa Fluoride Study which tracked about 700 Iowa children for sixteen years. Nine-year-old “Iowa children who lived in communities where the water was fluoridated were 50 percent more likely to have mild fluorosis… than [nine-year-old] children living in nonfluoridated areas of the state,” writes Fagin.

The study adds to a growing literature of shocking scientific studies proving fluoride’s link with all manner of health defects, even as governments in the west, including the UK, make plans to mass medicate the population against their will with this deadly toxin. Most Americans already drink artificially fluoridated water.

In 2005, a study conducted at the Harvard School of Dental Health found that fluoride in tap water directly contributes to causing bone cancer in young boys.

“New American research suggests that boys exposed to fluoride between the ages of five and 10 will suffer an increased rate of osteosarcoma – bone cancer – between the ages of 10 and 19,” according to a London Observer article about the study.

Based on the findings of the study, the respected Environmental Working Group lobbied to have fluoride in tap water be added to the US government’s classified list of substances known or anticipated to cause cancer in humans.

Cancer rates in the U.S. have skyrocketed with one in three people now contracting the disease at some stage in their life.

The link to bone cancer has also been discovered by other scientists, but a controversy ensued after it emerged that Harvard Professor Chester Douglass, who downplayed the connection in his final report, was in fact editor-in-chief of The Colgate Oral Health Report, a quarterly newsletter funded by Colgate-Palmolive Co., which makes fluoridated toothpaste.

An August 2006 Chinese study found that fluoride in drinking water damages children’s liver and kidney functions.

Growing opposition to fluoridation of water supplies in light of this evidence is contributing to a scaling back of water fluoridation programs, with voters in places like Mount Pleasant calling for the amount added to be reduced.

With awareness about sodium fluoride on the increase, the establishment is now moving to demonize anyone who raises the issue as a dangerous lunatic. In an official press release today, the Fluoride Action Network slams “recent mischaracterizations of fluoridation opponents by political pundits Rachel Maddow, Keith Olbermann and others in conjunction with Senator Harry Reid’s Nevada re-election campaign.”

As we wrote earlier this month, Keith Olbermann sardonically attacked Nevada primary winner Sharron Angle for speaking out against water fluoridation, “because she thinks the fluoride might be poison.”

Amidst his sophomoric jibes, Olbermann failed to explain why, if fluoride isn’t a poison as he claims, the word “toxic” is written on the packaging of bags of sodium fluoride that are dumped into the water supply of many Americans.

Sodium fluoride is a Part II Poison under the UK Poisons Act 1972. In addition, toothpaste manufacturers are required by law to include the following text on their products, “If you accidentally swallow more than used for brushing, seek professional help or contact a poison control center immediately.”

“FAN’s website http://www.FluorideAlert.org has a wealth of scientific information indicating that water fluoridation is neither safe nor effective,” states the press release. “In fact, mounting evidence shows that it is harmful to large segments of the population and has helped to create an epidemic of dental fluorosis in children.” On April 12, 2010, Time magazine listed fluoride as one of the “Top Ten Common Household Toxins” and described fluoride as both “neurotoxic and potentially tumorigenic if swallowed.”

Watch a lecture on sodium fluoride presented by Dr. Phyllis Mullenix Ph.D below.

FACTS ABOUT FLUORIDE

- Fluoride is a waste by-product of the fertilizer and aluminum industry and it’s also a Part II Poison under the UK Poisons Act 1972.

- Fluoride is one of the basic ingredients in both PROZAC (FLUoxetene Hydrochloride) and Sarin nerve gas (Isopropyl-Methyl-Phosphoryl FLUoride).

- USAF Major George R. Jordan testified before Un-American Activity committees of Congress in the 1950’s that in his post as U.S.-Soviet liaison officer, the Soviets openly admitted to “Using the fluoride in the water supplies in their concentration camps, to make the prisoners stupid, docile, and subservient.”

- The first occurrence of fluoridated drinking water on Earth was found in Germany’s Nazi prison camps. The Gestapo had little concern about fluoride’s supposed effect on children’s teeth; their alleged reason for mass-medicating water with sodium fluoride was to sterilize humans and force the people in their concentration camps into calm submission. (Ref. book: “The Crime and Punishment of I.G. Farben” by Joseph Borkin.)

- 97% of western Europe has rejected fluoridated water due to the known health risks, however 10% of Britons drink it and the UK government is trying to fast track the fluoridation of the entire country’s water supply.

- In Germany, Belgium and Luxembourg fluoridation of water was rejected because it was classified as compulsive medication against the subject’s will and therefore violated fundamental human rights.

- In November of 2006, the American Dental Association (ADA) advised that parents should avoid giving babies fluoridated water.

- Sources of fluoride include: fluoride dental products, fluoride pesticides, fluoridated pharmaceuticals, processed foods made with fluoridated water, and tea.

Click here to find out if your water supply is poisoned with deadly fluoride.