RSS feed
  • Missouri University of Science and Technology attempts to paint file-sharers as mentally ill, recommends snooping software be deployed

    Dr. Sriram Chellappan of Missouri University of Science and Technology recommends monitoring students’ file sharing behavior with spyware to identify signs of “mental disorders.”

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/93950152/12-Tech-soc-Kcmwl-1

    Proactively discovering depressive symptoms from passive and unobtrusive Internet usage monitoring:

    Using the correlating Internet usage features derived in our study, we are currently attempting to build a classifier to proactively discover depressive symptoms among students by passive, unobtrusive and run-time monitoring of their Internet usage. The classifier can be readily deployed at campus settings to discover depressive symptoms among students. If privacy is a concern, it is straightforward to deploy the classifier into students’ personal computers also. Privacy is implicit,and the student can voluntarily seek support services. We believe that such an approach will significantly improve both the quality and timeliness of detection and treatment of mental disorders today.

    According to the paper, if use p2p file sharing networks you may be mentally ill and need treatment.  Let me guess what this treatment would involve: Anti-depressants, amphetamines, and therapy by one of the school’s commie social worker therapists? After all, they wouldn’t want any brainwashed slaves-in-training to have access to unapproved information from the underground p2p networks that might interfere with their “education.”

    The Internet usage monitoring spyware they have developed represents a fusion of medical nanny state surveillance with copyright enforcement.  I’d bet money that government, copyright lobby, elite foundations, or some combination thereof funded this abomination.

    Remember, every time you download a copyrighted file, God kills a kitten, because file sharing is terrorism.

  • Machine vision software tags and tracks humans across camera networks

    For your own safety, of course.

  • Facebook saves everything forever, has ‘shadow profiles’ for non-users

    From http://www.identityblog.com/?p=1201

    no date topic status files
    01 18-AUG-2011 Pokes.
    Pokes are kept even after the user “removes” them.
    Filed with the Irish DPC Complaint (PDF)
    Attachments (ZIP)
    02 18-AUG-2011 Shadow Profiles.
    Facebook is collecting data about people without their knowledge. This information is used to substitute existing profiles and to create profiles of non-users.
    Filed with the Irish DPC Complaint (PDF)
    Attachments (ZIP)
    03 18-AUG-2011 Tagging.
    Tags are used without the specific consent of the user. Users have to “untag” themselves (opt-out).
    Info: Facebook announced changes.
    Filed with the Irish DPC Complaint (PDF)
    Attachments (ZIP)
    04 18-AUG-2011 Synchronizing.
    Facebook is gathering personal data e.g. via its iPhone-App or the “friend finder”. This data is used by Facebook without the consent of the data subjects.
    Filed with the Irish DPC Complaint (PDF)
    Attachments (ZIP)
    05 18-AUG-2011 Deleted Postings.
    Postings that have been deleted showed up in the set of data that was received from Facebook.
    Filed with the Irish DPC Complaint (PDF)
    Attachments (ZIP)
    06 18-AUG-2011 Postings on other Users’ Pages.
    Users cannot see the settings under which content is distributed that they post on other’s pages.
    Filed with the Irish DPC Complaint (PDF)
    Attachments (ZIP)
    07 18-AUG-2011 Messages.
    Messages (incl. Chat-Messages) are stored by Facebook even after the user “deleted” them. This means that all direct communication on Facebook can never be deleted.
    Filed with the Irish DPC Complaint (PDF)
    Attachments (ZIP)
    08 18-AUG-2011 Privacy Policy and Consent.
    The privacy policy is vague, unclear and contradictory. If European and Irish standards are applied, the consent to the privacy policy is not valid.
    Filed with the Irish DPC Complaint (PDF)
    Attachments (ZIP)
    09 18-AUG-2011 Face Recognition.
    The new face recognition feature is an inproportionate violation of the users right to privacy. Proper information and an unambiguous consent of the users is missing.
    Filed with the Irish DPC Complaint (PDF)
    Attachments (ZIP)
    10 18-AUG-2011 Access Request.
    Access Requests have not been answered fully. Many categories of information are missing.
    Filed with the Irish DPC Complaint (PDF)
    Attachments (ZIP)
    11 18-AUG-2011 Deleted Tags.
    Tags that were “removed” by the user, are only deactivated but saved by Facebook.
    Filed with the Irish DPC Complaint (PDF)
    Attachments (ZIP)
    12 18-AUG-2011 Data Security.
    In its terms, Facebook says that it does not guarantee any level of data security.
    Filed with the Irish DPC Complaint (PDF)
    Attachments (ZIP)
    13 18-AUG-2011 Applications.
    Applications of “friends” can access data of the user. There is no guarantee that these applications are following European privacy standards.
    Filed with the Irish DPC Complaint (PDF)
    Attachments (ZIP)
    14 18-AUG-2011 Deleted Friends.
    All removed friends are stored by Facebook.
    Filed with the Irish DPC Complaint (PDF)
    Attachments (ZIP)
    15 18-AUG-2011 Excessive processing of Data.
    Facebook is hosting enormous amounts of personal data and it is processing all data for its own purposes.
    It seems Facebook is a prime example of illegal “excessive processing”.
    Filed with the Irish DPC Complaint (PDF)
    Attachments (ZIP)
    16 18-AUG-2011 Opt-Out.
    Facebook is running an opt-out system instead of an opt-in system, which is required by European law.
    Filed with the Irish DPC Complaint (PDF)
    Attachments (ZIP)
    24-AUG-2011 Letter from the Irish DPC. Letter (PDF)
    15-SEPT-2011 Letter to the Irish DPC concerning the new privacy policy and new settings on Facebook. Letter (PDF)
    17 19-SEPT-2011 Like Button.
    The Like Button is creating extended user data that can be used to track users all over the internet. There is no legitimate purpose for the creation of the data. Users have not consented to the use.
    Filed with the Irish DPC Complaint (PDF)
    Attachments (ZIP)
    18 19-SEPT-2011 Obligations as Processor.
    Facebook has certain obligations as a provider of a “cloud service” (e.g. not using third party data for its own purposes or only processing data when instructed to do so by the user).
    Filed with the Irish DPC Complaint (PDF)
    Attachments (ZIP)
    19 19-SEPT-2011 Picture Privacy Settings.
    The privacy settings only regulate who can see the link to a picture. The picture itself is “public” on the internet. This makes it easy to circumvent the settings.
    Filed with the Irish DPC Complaint (PDF)
    Attachments (ZIP)
    20 19-SEPT-2011 Deleted Pictures.
    Facebook is only deleting the link to pictures. The pictures are still public on the internet for a certain period of time (more than 32 hours).
    Filed with the Irish DPC Complaint (PDF)
    Attachments (ZIP)
    21 19-SEPT-2011 Groups.
    Users can be added to groups without their consent. Users may end up in groups that lead other to false impressions about a person.
    Filed with the Irish DPC Complaint (PDF)
    Attachments (ZIP)
    22 19-SEPT-2011 New Policies.
    The policies are changed very frequently, users do not get properly informed, they are not asked to consent to new policies.
    Filed with the Irish DPC Complaint (PDF)
    Attachments (ZIP)
  • Message from Anonymous: Operation Facebook, Nov 5 2011

    This ought to be interesting. I’ll get the marshmallows.

  • NY Cop makes self famous

    If he hadn’t gotten all enraged, this video wouldn’t have drawn attention to him doing whatever it is he didn’t want us to know about, probably just standing there to look tough or terrorize citizens in the form of random searches, here in police state America.

    They have to fund their parasitic bureaucracy somehow, and the prison system needs fresh meat, so don’t be shocked when we see a lot more jackboots storming around and hauling people off under National Security, Patriot Act, Military Commissions, etc.  Federalized police officers will get away wtih even more violence and criminal activity in the name of fighting terror, and  maintaining “order” – their kind of order, a New World Order governing over the human cattle.

    Niagara Frontier Transportation Authorityshould take a stand for liberty and the Constitution, and fire this officer for breaking the law while on duty.   He threatened this citizen for doing something perfectly legal under the First Amendment- filming in public. Freedom of the press. We have the right to collect information in a public space and disseminate that information.

    An officer is a public servant, and being in a public space has no expectation of privacy, and has no right to threaten this person.  Police and government, Google, and many other private businesses have cameras all over the place, and don’t get anyone’s permission first.  The officer is clearly breaking the law by threatening bodily harm and prosecutors should file charges against him.

  • Feds to Mandate Black Box on all New Cars

    Kurt Nimmo

    Prison Planet
    May 24, 2011

    Feds to Mandate Black Box on all New Cars  carblackbox thumb 550xauto 63071

    The feds will mandate next month that all new cars be fitted with a black box, according to news reports. So-called black boxes record information about speed, seat belt use and brake application.

    The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has been involved in the use of black boxes since their introduction. In 2006, the safety administration encouraged but did not require automobile manufacturers to install the systems and also did not set a single standard for the way data would be recorded, according to the New York Times.

    In February, NHTSA administrator David Strickland said the government was considering making the technology mandatory in the wake of recalls of millions of Toyota vehicles. Strickland made the disclosure to a subcommittee hearing by the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

    Now they will make the installation of these device mandatory under federal law. If we are to gauge the reaction of the corporate media, this story is not very important. Outside of industry and technology publications, the story was not reported.

    Feds to Mandate Black Box on all New Cars  150709banner2

    Computer chip manufacturer Intel showed off its event recorder last year following the Toyota recall. “With new vehicles, there will very likely be video cameras inside and outside,” said Intel’s chief technology office, Justin Rattner, in a July, 2010, interview. “It’s not particularly new or stunning, but when you combine the cameras with GPS, you’re geo-tagging the video.”

    In other words, your car – like your smart phone – may soon become a surveillance device and high-tech snooping will be mandated by the federal government.

  • Tweeting again

    I was using a service to tweet my posts to twitter but that stopped working so I installed a plugin for the blog which will auto-tweet posts.   Additionally I’m running a local url shortner, so there won’t be any 3rd party tracking of your clicks (excluding the NSA vacuuming up most if not all internet traffic).

    But anyhow, this blog doesn’t use Google Ananlytics or URL forwarding services like bit.ly (sorry, working on that), facebook iframes with “Like Buttons” (and javascripts), or other shady code, so just be aware I’m trying to prevent any 3rd party tracking and protecting your privacy as much as possible.  If you browse this site thru a proxy, you can rest assured I’m not going to have your browser pinging the mothership and wasting your efforts, but hopefully you’re blocking cross site JS anyway.  It’s not just the government that wants to sniff our data, it’s private corporations like credit reporting agencies, and marketers who want to buy and sell your infos and annoy the living crap out of you.

    I don’t have a privacy policy posted, but I do log IP addresses for my own protection in case someone hacks the blog.

    Thanks for reading and here’s the Twitter feed

    By the way, I can send tweets from my phone in case TSHTF and I can’t post directly to the blog.

  • Snuggly the Security Bear